Friday, March 21, 2008

UMNO SELF ASSASINATION

I'd like to begin this blog, after post general elections 2008, with the above question.

It has been 2 weeks since the outcome of the 13th General Elections results that has affected most malaysians. Though many were surprised at its outcome, but nonetheless it was most welcome by most malaysias, especially in the peninsula. UMNO for one, has not stood up tall this time around although it manage to secure quite a big number of seats compare to other parties to govern effectively at the national level. Like all parties of the National Front, UMNO hasn't showed its weaknesses, though among its members, rumblings of poor leadership is fast becoming the talk at any gatherings, from coffee-shop talks to the Maulidur Rasul gatherings.

Ku Li, together with Mukriz has teamed up with Mahathir in gathering force to out throw Pak Lah.

One question remain till this day,
Can Umno adapt to the new Malaysian political landscape and make reform its mantra?

They are wondering if the post-March 8 Umno can appreciate that its choice of leaders and policies will have an impact on how Malaysians view the Barisan Nasional. Choose or defend leaders with baggage and the coalition partners too could be dragged down by the draft of disapproval.

The coalition partners got a partial answer this week with the return of Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib to the cabinet as the Rural Development Minister and Tengku Adnan Mansor’s appointment as the secretary-general of Umno and the Barisan Nasional.

One seniou MCA member said this, “The party has nothing against Muhammad Taib but Umno has to realise that it is no longer sufficient to think about what Umno members feel about their leaders. We have to win over younger voters who have a different value system.’’

True enough. Umno has always had its own value system. It is something that is not always hinged on character and integrity but on the patronage system and the person’s utility to the party. The party still has a feudal mentality.

This different set of values allowed the party to embrace the late Zakaria Deros, the warlord in Klang who attracted derision outside the party for building a palatial mansion in the midst of a squatter colony without any approvals.
When he was let off without even a token fine, Umno members did not bat an eyelid. They pointed out that he was a loyal party worker – the type who rented an ambulance to ferry the disabled to vote for BN in the Ijok by-election last year and the type who could bring out 10,000 party faithfuls to the street. Never mind that many Malaysians viewed the man as the typical Umno politician they detested – arrogant and seemingly above the law.

So if this is the perception umno gave to other malays who are not its member, would the same be said to other malaysians, namely the chinese, indians and many others in Sabah and Sarawak?

UMNO till today has not seem to know what hit them, or why it was hit. Sheer ignorance will be too costly if it still refuse the look at itself from others point of view. The main malay power will not be powerful anymore if steps are not taken to remedy the situation.




The MCA believed that the Chinese electorate would punish them for the actions of Umno politicians like Zakaria Deros. They were right. Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng and others made Zakaria a staple of their stump speeches. Still, Umno did not reject him.

When he died a few days after the elections, some 5,000 people visited his home to pay their respects. Among them, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. Zakaria was held up as a solid party man, a role model of sorts.

Non-party members could only shake their heads in amazement and wonder how someone who did not pay land assessment for 12 years could be held up as a role model. Many of them revisited this question this week when former Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib was appointed Rural Development Minister.

How can a politician who was caught for not declaring several million ringgit in cash by Australian authorities in 1996 find himself back in the cabinet? Abdullah and others in Umno say that the former school teacher has paid his dues – he gave up his positions in the government and party, kept clear of any controversy and stayed loyal to the party.

Those familiar with the thinking in government circles say the Umno rank-and-file would not have allowed Abdullah to make the sweeping changes to the cabinet that he wanted – such as not naming any parliamentary secretaries, dropping Rafidah Aziz and appointing Amirsham Aziz and Zaid Ibrahim as senators – if they sensed their interests were being marginalised.

A government official said: “Mat Taib is very popular with the party grassroots. His appointment has gone down well with them. Changes will only be possible if the party flank feels a certain comfort level.’’

Abdullah is hopeful that the party’s 210 divisions will find a high comfort level with Tengku Adnan Mansor as the party-secretary-general. In Umno, he is respected as a warlord, someone who can get things done. The division chiefs say that if he were the secretary-general in the run-up to the polls, funds, banners and flags would have reached the ground faster than they did.

But party members also believe that Abdullah gave him the senior role of rebuilding the party to keep him happy.

With rumblings of a revolt by some party leaders like Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Tun Mahathir Mohamad, the party president needs all the strongest men and women at his side. After dropping Tengku Adnan from the Cabinet, he needed to placate the former Tourism Minister.

But outside the party and in organisations like the Bar Council, this choice borders on the surreal. After all there is more than a good chance that Ku Nan, as he is known in party circles, will be censured by the Royal Commission on the Judiciary for his role in the V K Lingam judge-fixing scandal. He may be chastised for being a less than reliable witness during the proceedings. The findings of the commission will tar him for life with many Malaysians.

But in Umno, he will be revered as the secretary-general. Why? Because the party respects raw power and the ability to use it. Ku Nan has both.

The problem is that he will also be the secretary-general of the BN. And the MCA, Gerakan and even some component parties in Sarawak will have a tough time talking about reforms and changes, if people with baggage are still in positions of power.

No comments: